Chicago, IL. (ECWd) –
City of Chicago Alderman and Her Chief of Staff Indicted on Federal Bribery Charges
CHICAGO — A federal grand jury today indicted City of Chicago Alderman CARRIE M. AUSTIN and her Chief of Staff on bribery offenses for allegedly conspiring to receive home improvements from construction contractors seeking city assistance for a development project in Austin’s Far South Side ward.
Austin, 72, of Chicago, is charged with one count of conspiring to use interstate facilities to promote bribery, two counts of using interstate facilities to promote bribery, and one count of willfully making materially false statements to the FBI. Austin’s Chief of Staff, CHESTER WILSON JR., 55, of Chicago, is charged with one count of conspiring to use interstate facilities to promote bribery, two counts of using interstate facilities to promote bribery, and one count of theft of government funds.
The indictment was returned today in U.S. District Court in Chicago. Arraignments have not yet been scheduled.
The indictment was announced by John R. Lausch, Jr., United States Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois; Emmerson Buie, Jr., Special Agent-in-Charge of the Chicago Field Office of the FBI; Phyllis K. Fong, Inspector General for the U.S. Department of Agriculture; Kathy A. Enstrom, Special Agent-in-Charge of the IRS Criminal Investigation Division in Chicago; and Joseph M. Ferguson, Inspector General for the City of Chicago. The government is represented by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Andrianna Kastanek and Katie M. Durick.
According to the indictment, starting in 2014 a construction company planned to construct a residential development in Austin’s ward at a cost of approximately $49.6 million. Under an agreement with the city, the company was responsible for making infrastructure improvements within the project, including construction of new interior streets, street lighting, landscaping, and sidewalk improvements, and was eligible to receive more than $10 million in tax increment financing and other payments from the city.
The indictment alleges that, beginning in 2016, Austin and Wilson were provided with personal benefits by the owner of the construction company and other contractors in an effort to influence them in their official capacities. The benefits included home improvements, furniture, and appliances for Austin’s residence, and home improvement materials and services for rental properties owned by Wilson, the indictment states.
According to the charges, in June 2017 a contractor on the development project paid an invoice for $5,250 to cover a portion of the purchase price of kitchen cabinets at Austin’s residence by falsely representing that the cabinets were for an address within the development. In addition, in July 2017 Austin accepted from a contractor on the project an offer to pay for two “brand new” and “expensive” sump pumps, and to have the contractor’s family member buy and install a new dehumidifier, the indictment states. Wilson also solicited benefits from a contractor on the project for his rental property, including services for “heating and air,” the charges allege. In October 2017 the contractor told Wilson that he would pay for a portion of a new HVAC system at Wilson’s property because, “you help me a lot, and I’ll help you,” the indictment states.
The indictment alleges that Austin and Wilson authorized the expenditure of aldermanic menu funds to benefit the construction company for infrastructure within the development, and that on multiple occasions in 2017 and 2018 Austin coordinated with the construction company owner to seek the city’s release of TIF and other payments.
The theft charge against Wilson accuses him of engaging in a separate scheme to purchase Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits at a discount. Wilson, who was not eligible for SNAP benefits due to his city of Chicago salary, allegedly obtained a card containing SNAP benefits by paying cash to the recipient in an amount below the face value of the card, the indictment states.
The public is reminded that an indictment is not evidence of guilt. The defendants are presumed innocent and entitled to a fair trial at which the government has the burden of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The conspiracy, bribery, and false statement counts are each punishable by up to five years in federal prison, while the theft charge is punishable by up to one year. If convicted, the Court must impose reasonable sentences under federal sentencing statutes and the advisory U.S. Sentencing Guidelines.
A. LincolnPosted at 08:05h, 02 July
Who knew? Must just be a simple misunderstanding by the alderman and the chief of staff. They might have thought this type of activity was stated or implied in their oath of office, or a normal and customary perk of their office or stated or implied in the Cook County Democratic Central Committee’s charter.
In any event, they’ll get it worked out. Hey, this is Chicago!
DavePosted at 14:20h, 02 July
So, the rumors appear to be true
bbPosted at 19:46h, 02 July
Plenty more where That came from.Preckwinkle,Lightfoot,Chuy Garcia,anyone associated with Rahm the traitor,Pritzker,Chicago public health dept.,Swame the a.g.
Greg GPosted at 08:20h, 04 July
How soon before she pulls the race card?
PKPosted at 22:52h, 04 July
Strangely, the indictment refers to Austin as an “Alderman”? Alderwoman or alderperson would be good. Is the City of Chicago’s administration still using the language “Alderman” too?
David SomersetPosted at 08:28h, 06 July
Chicago really needs to get woke and update their city code titles.
New suggestion for old alderman title: Alderman$$$
Suggestion for old mayor title: Mayor???
Suggestion for old commissioner (e.g. commissioner of building and zoning): Commissioner$
PKPosted at 09:41h, 06 July
The Illinois General Assembly no longer uses “chairman”…that title is now chairperson. Lobbyist$ also had some of the flooring structure removed with their recently enacted ethics law.
Out of place today, titles like Alderman and Assemblyman belong in the lexicon of 1960’s commercial television and radio programming, and the indictment seems to be resurrecting that era.
Alderperson$ minus $ is fine, I guess.
Greg GPosted at 13:23h, 08 July
Lets start calling them what they are; “The accused, The defendant, The guilty” after conviction. My favorite is “Alderscum”