• Got a tip?
  • Contact Us
  • Laws-Forms-Info
Menu
  • Got a tip?
  • Contact Us
  • Laws-Forms-Info
  • In The News
  • Gov Plates
  • Live Video
Menu
  • In The News
  • Gov Plates
  • Live Video

Support
Our Mission

Support Our Mission

login

January 25, 2021

Collinsville, feature, Madison County

City of Collinsville accused of SLAPPing critics -

BY JOHN KRAFT & KIRK ALLEN

ON September 4, 2017

COLLINSVILLE, IL. (ECWd) -

In a Motion to Dismiss an Ordinance Violation, three Defendants claim the City of Collinsville has wrongly accused them of certain Ordinance Violations related to real estate they own.

The combined Motion to Dismiss alleges that:

  • there were no dates alleging the zoning issue, when it was allegedly violated, and when any notices were sent to Defendants
  • complaint was filed prior to expiration of license
  • failure of city to adhere to their own Ordinances regarding zoning and violations
  • the city filed a SLAPP - Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation

According to the Motion, Defendants were regular attendees at City of Collinsville public meetings where they also provided public comment, sometimes critical of city officials. Defendants also supported the opponents of certain Aldermen during the last election. Defendants claim the purpose of this lawsuit brought by the city was to impose financial burdens on them in order to defend the charges, and to interfere with their rental income.

The Illinois Citizen Participation Act, or the "Anti-SLAPP Act" was enacted to curb so-called Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation, to provide for expedited relief from SLAPPS, to help protect the defendants in SLAPP cases, and to provide monetary relief to the victims of a SLAPP.

SLAPPs are generally meritless lawsuits use in retaliation against a party for attempting to participate in government by exercising their rights to free speech, free association, and the freedom to petition their government. These suits are aimed at prohibiting and punishing citizens who exercise these rights.

Prior to this suit being filed by the City of Collinsville, Defendant(s) attended every council meeting in 2017, spoke during the allotted public comment time during the meetings which included:  opposed certain actions by the council, address the council on the fitness of a person to be responsible for public funds since she had filed bankruptcy, the Mayor's nonpayment of certain real estate taxes, Councilman Cheryl Brombolich's election based on the allegations that she misappropriated city funds thru the use of city credit cards, and performance of certain other officials and employees of the city.

See the Motion to Dismiss below, or download (here):

PDF4500

.

Help Us Keep Shining The Light On Local Governments

Share This
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Like This
[fblike]
Related

Marshall Residents being asked again to hold the forever liability and maintenance costs of the Velsicol Superfund Site

January 24, 2021

Appellate Court Argument re: Brotze v Carlinville and Illinois Alluvial

January 22, 2021

Joliet Park District: Joliet Police investigating potential large sums of financial improprieties by a former employee

January 21, 2021
1 Comment
  • Adria
    Posted at 12:24h, 05 September

    Wow, I didn’t know local governments were allowed to file such claims. Are there any regulatory implications for SLAPP?

Related

Marshall Residents being asked again to hold the forever liability and maintenance costs of the Velsicol Superfund Site

January 24, 2021

Appellate Court Argument re: Brotze v Carlinville and Illinois Alluvial

January 22, 2021

Joliet Park District: Joliet Police investigating potential large sums of financial improprieties by a former employee

January 21, 2021
1 Comment
  • Adria
    Posted at 12:24h, 05 September

    Wow, I didn’t know local governments were allowed to file such claims. Are there any regulatory implications for SLAPP?

  • Got a tip?
  • Laws-Forms-Info
  • In The News
  • Gov Plates
  • Live Video
  • Facebook